Evlilikte mal rejimi as a subject usually becomes important at the stage of dividing the assets in the divorce process. Our Turkish Civil Code contains provisions in Articles 202 et seq. on how assets held during the marriage are to be divided upon the termination of the marriage. This is because, in the divorce process, the parties usually cannot agree on the division of assets, and recourse is had to these provisions setting out the matrimonial property regimes. In this article, we discuss the types of matrimonial property regime, the groups of assets in the participation in acquired property regime, which is the statutory matrimonial property regime, liquidation and the calculation of the participation claim.
In Turkish law, there are four matrimonial property regimes that may apply. These are;
The parties are free to choose one of these matrimonial property regimes. Furthermore, a chosen matrimonial property regime may later be changed by choosing another matrimonial property regime. In order for the provisions of the matrimonial property regime they have chosen to apply, the spouses must enter into a matrimonial property agreement.
If no choice has been made
If no such choice has been made, the provisions of the participation in acquired property regime, which is the statutory matrimonial property regime under the Civil Code, will apply.
The Turkish Civil Code, which entered into force on 1 January 2002, adopted the participation in acquired property regime as the statutory matrimonial property regime. Accordingly, for spouses who married after 1 January 2002, the participation in acquired property regime will apply to them if they have not chosen an optional matrimonial property regime. For those who married before 1 January 2002, the participation in acquired property regime will apply as of that date. Under the participation in acquired property regime, there are two estates independent of each other: the wife’s assets and the husband’s assets. The wife’s and husband’s assets are in turn each divided into two categories: acquired property and personal property.
Article 219/1 TCC defines acquired property as “the assets acquired by each spouse for consideration during the continuation of the property regime” . Three elements derive from this definition: 1) acquisition during the continuation of the property regime, 2) being an asset, 3) acquisition for consideration (labour, money, assets).
The second paragraph of the article lists the following as examples of acquired property: 1. acquisitions in return for work, 2. payments made by social security or social assistance institutions and organisations or by funds and similar bodies established to assist staff, 3. compensation paid for loss of capacity to work, 4. income from personal property, 5. assets replacing acquired property. The examples listed in this article are not exhaustive; assets falling within the definition and not included in personal property are regarded as acquired property.
Article 220 TCC lists personal property by operation of law as follows: 1. items used exclusively for the personal use of one of the spouses, 2. assets belonging to one of the spouses at the beginning of the property regime or subsequently acquired by a spouse by inheritance or otherwise gratuitously, 3. claims for non-pecuniary damages, 4. assets replacing personal property.
Acquired property · TCC Art. 219
Personal property · TCC Art. 220
Article 221 TCC provides: “By means of a matrimonial property agreement, the spouses may agree that assets arising from the practice of a profession or the operation of a business which would otherwise form part of acquired property shall be deemed personal property. By means of a matrimonial property agreement, the spouses may also agree that income from personal property shall not form part of acquired property” and thus the spouses are given the possibility of agreeing, by concluding a matrimonial property agreement, that assets arising from the practice of a profession or the operation of a business which would otherwise form part of acquired property shall be deemed personal property.
Article 222 TCC contains a provision parallel to the provision on proof in Article 6 TCC. “A person who claims that a particular item of property belongs to one of the spouses is obliged to prove that claim” (Article 222/1 TCC). Accordingly, the person making a claim will bear the burden of proving it. The second and third paragraphs of the article introduce two important presumptions.
Two important presumptions · TCC Art. 222/2-3
“Property which cannot be proven to belong to either spouse is deemed to be in their co-ownership in shares (Article 222/2 TCC).” “All the property of a spouse is deemed to be acquired property until the contrary is proven (Article 222/3 TCC).”
The grounds for the termination of the marital union are regulated in Article 225 TCC. According to this provision, “The property regime ends upon the death of one of the spouses or upon the adoption of another property regime. Where the court decides that the marriage is to be terminated by annulment or divorce, or that there is to be a transition to separation of property, the property regime ends with effect from the date of the action (Article 225 TCC).”
After the marital union has ended, the liquidation stage of the property regime will commence as a consequence of the termination of the participation in acquired property regime. As a rule, liquidation may be carried out on the basis of a liquidation agreement between the spouses, the validity of which is not subject to any formal requirement and the rules of which they determine themselves. However, if the spouses have not concluded such a liquidation agreement, liquidation is carried out through a liquidation action brought by one of the spouses or their heirs.
Liquidation agreement
Its validity is not subject to any formal requirement; the rules are determined by the spouses.
Liquidation action
In the absence of agreement, liquidation is carried out by means of an action brought by one of the spouses or by their heirs.
The liquidation action to be brought is in the nature of a formative action. The court having subject-matter jurisdiction over a liquidation action is the family court. Territorial jurisdiction in liquidation actions is regulated in Article 214 TCC.
“In actions between spouses or heirs concerning the liquidation of a property regime, the following courts have jurisdiction: 1. where the property regime ends by death, the court of the deceased’s last domicile; 2. where divorce, annulment of the marriage or separation of property by the judge is ordered, the court having jurisdiction over those actions; 3. in other cases, the court of the defendant spouse’s domicile (Article 214 TCC).”
Turkish Civil Code, Art. 214
Liquidation essentially consists of four stages. These are:
Each spouse takes back his or her property held by the other spouse (Article 226/1 TCC). For example, if a piece of jewellery has been taken, it will be returned to the spouse from whom it was taken.
Article 226/2 TCC provides: “During liquidation, if there is property held in co-ownership in shares, one of the spouses may, in addition to making use of the other options provided for by law, request that the property be allocated to him or her undivided by proving an overriding interest and paying the other spouse’s share” and thus the possibility of allocating property held by the spouses in co-ownership in shares to one of them is provided. For such allocation, the following conditions must be met:
Conditions for allocation · TCC Art. 226/2
1- There must be an item held solely in the co-ownership in shares of the spouses,
2- The spouse must have an overriding interest,
3- The value of the share must be paid,
4- The participation in acquired property regime must have ended and liquidation must have commenced,
5- There must be a request.
The spouses may settle their mutual debts (Article 226/3 TCC). The debts that the spouses settle may arise from any kind of obligation. The spouses may also settle between themselves their debts to third parties. For example, where one spouse is indebted to a third party from whom the other spouse has a claim, the spouses may make arrangements between themselves under the provisions of the law of obligations.
The property in the spouses’ estates is divided into two: personal property and acquired property. This property is assessed according to its condition at the time the property regime ends (Article 228/1 TCC). The time of termination will be determined in accordance with Article 225 TCC. A different rule has been introduced regarding the allocation to a category of property of social security payments made to a spouse (Article 228/2 TCC): “Lump-sum payments made to one of the spouses by social security or social assistance institutions, or compensation paid for loss of capacity to work, shall, if, instead of the lump-sum payment or compensation, and in accordance with the procedure applied by the relevant social security or social assistance institution, a lifetime annuity had been granted, the capitalised value of the annuity for the period following the termination of the matrimonial property regime, as it would have stood on that date, is taken into account in the liquidation as personal property in that amount.”
Article 231 TCC defines the surplus value as “the amount remaining after deducting the debts relating to that property from the total value of each spouse’s acquired property, including the amounts obtained through addition and equalisation” . On the basis of this definition, the assets and liabilities may be identified as follows:
Assets
Liabilities
On this matter, TCC Art. 227 provides “Where one of the spouses has contributed, without receiving any or adequate consideration, to the acquisition, improvement or preservation of property belonging to the other, he or she shall, upon liquidation, have a claim in proportion to his or her contribution for the increase in value of that property, and this claim shall be calculated according to the value of that property at the time of liquidation; where there has been a loss in value, the original value of the contribution shall be taken as the basis” . For this article to apply, the following four conditions must be fulfilled:
For this calculation to be made, three stages must essentially be completed: calculation of 1) the increase in value, 2) the share in the increase in value, and 3) the claim for a share in the increase in value.
1- Increase in Value: The difference between the initial value of the asset and its value at the time the property regime ends.
If the contribution was made after acquisition, Initial value = Value of the asset on the date of the contribution + Amount of contribution
2- Share in the Increase in Value: This is found by proportionally reflecting the contribution to the initial value in the increase in value of the asset to which the contribution was made. Expressed as a formula:
Formula
The compensation claim may be defined as the claim arising in favour of the financing group of assets where a spouse has met debts relating to acquired property out of personal property, or debts relating to personal property out of acquired property (TCC Art. 230/1).
Each debt encumbers the category of assets to which it relates. A debt whose category cannot be determined is deemed to relate to acquired property (TCC Art. 230/2).
There are two types of equalisation claim: the ordinary equalisation claim and the extraordinary equalisation claim. Where a spouse’s debts relating to acquired property are paid from personal property, or debts relating to personal property are paid from acquired property, an ordinary equalisation claim will arise.
From acquired property to the personal property category = equalisation claim in the surplus value calculation as an asset;
From personal property to the acquired property category = equalisation claim in the value calculation as a liability is included.
Where a contribution has been made from one category of property to the acquisition, improvement or preservation of property in the other category, an extraordinary equalisation claim will arise (Article 230/3 TCC). Where there is an increase or decrease in value, the extraordinary equalisation claim comes into play.
Extraordinary equalisation claim = basic contribution + share in the increase in value or share in the decrease in value.
Ordinary equalisation claim
Arises where a debt relating to one category of assets has been paid out of the other category of assets.
Extraordinary equalisation claim · TCC Art. 230/3
Arises where one category of assets has contributed to the acquisition, improvement or preservation of an asset in the other category.
Article 229 TCC provides that the following are to be added as values to acquired property:
Article 231 TCC defines the surplus value as “the amount remaining after deducting the debts relating to that property from the total value of each spouse’s acquired property, including the amounts obtained through addition and equalisation” is defined as follows.
Formula
Surplus Value = Assets − Liabilities
The participation claim may be determined in three ways: by law, by court decision and by agreement.
The participation claim and the share in the increase in value may be paid in kind or in money (TCC Art. 239/1). For payments in kind, the market value of the assets will be taken as the basis.
Deferral of payment · TCC Art. 239/2
TMK m. 239/2’de “If immediate payment of the participation claim and the share in the increase in value would cause serious difficulties for the debtor spouse, he or she may request that the payments be deferred for a reasonable period” and thus the possibility of deferring payment is provided.
Under the separation of property regime, the principle is that the wife’s and the husband’s assets are separate. – Under the separation of property regime, each spouse retains the rights of management, use and disposal over his or her own assets within the statutory limits (TCC Art. 242). Accordingly, if the spouses have chosen the separation of property regime;
apart from these cases, there will be no liquidation. Reference is made to the provisions on separation of property with sharing as regards evidence, liability for debts and the allocation of co-owned property.
The spouses may also choose the separation of property with sharing regime by means of a matrimonial property agreement. What distinguishes this regime from the separation of property regime is that its effect becomes apparent upon the termination of the marital union. This regime, which displays exactly the features of the separation of property regime during the marriage, manifests itself at the liquidation stage upon termination of the marital union in the following respects:
Property and investments in the joint use of the marital union are divided equally between the spouses.
It is regulated in Articles 256 et seq. of the Turkish Civil Code. The community of property regime will cover the community property and the spouses’ personal property. By concluding a matrimonial property agreement (commonly known as a marriage contract), the spouses may include their personal property in the community and create a community of property. On the other hand, the spouses are obliged to act jointly with respect to the assets tied to the marriage and may not make arbitrary dispositions of immovable and movable property.
Related page: Divorce Lawyer in Ankara — uncontested and contested divorce, custody, maintenance and division of property
Related legislation: Turkish Civil Code No. 4721 (mevzuat.gov.tr)
There are four matrimonial property regimes in Turkish law: participation in acquired property (the statutory regime), separation of property, separation of property with sharing, and community of property. The spouses are free to choose one of them and may subsequently change the regime they chose.
Eşler mal rejimi sözleşmesiyle bir seçim yapmamışsa, Türk Medeni Kanunu’nda yasal mal rejimi olarak kabul edilen edinilmiş mallara katılma rejimi hükümleri uygulanır.
TMK m. 220’ye göre eşlerden birinin yalnız kişisel kullanımına yarayan eşya, mal rejiminin başlangıcında eşe ait olan ya da sonradan miras veya karşılıksız kazanma yoluyla edinilen malvarlığı değerleri, manevi tazminat alacakları ve kişisel mallar yerine geçen değerler kişisel maldır.
TMK m. 225’e göre mal rejimi eşlerden birinin ölümü veya başka bir mal rejiminin kabulüyle sona erer. Mahkemece evliliğin iptali, boşanma veya mal ayrılığına geçilmesine karar verilmesi hâllerinde ise mal rejimi dava tarihinden geçerli olmak üzere sona erer.
Görevli mahkeme aile mahkemesidir. TMK m. 214’e göre ölümle sona ermede ölenin son yerleşim yeri mahkemesi; boşanma, evliliğin iptali veya mal ayrılığı kararında bu davalarda yetkili mahkeme; diğer durumlarda davalı eşin yerleşim yeri mahkemesi yetkilidir.
TMK m. 227’ye göre bir eş, diğerine ait bir malın edinilmesine, iyileştirilmesine veya korunmasına hiç ya da uygun bir karşılık almaksızın katkıda bulunmuşsa, tasfiyede bu maldaki değer artışı için katkısı oranında alacak hakkına sahip olur.
The participation claim and the share in increase in value may be paid in kind or in money. If immediate payment would cause serious difficulties for the debtor spouse, the debtor spouse may request that payment be deferred for a reasonable period (TMK Art. 239).
Consultation request
As UTU Hukuk Danışmanlık, we provide legal and advisory services in the field of family law.
Fill in the form and we will call you. You can also contact us directly: